sky
Careful cropping makes the view from my window look rather more exotic than it actually is.
1. posted by Thiemo at 18:07 on May 27, 2005
Looks almost the same everywhere: http://cloudscapes.antville.org/stories/907565/
add a comment
leaf
This is the same leaf that I scanned in and used as a background image in this design five years(!) ago (the template is broken but you get the idea, I hope).
ducks bw
1. posted by Ruben at 19:11 on May 25, 2005
Stop moving! I'm trying to make a picture here!
2. posted by jesse at 04:13 on July 12, 2005
Does a cayuga duck have a yellow spot on its head?
add a comment
testing Flickr badge:
read more »
1. posted by Erik at 09:26 on July 05, 2005
There is also a pretty decent htaccess cheatsheet at http://www.thejackol.com/htaccess-cheatsheet/
add a comment
This kind of vertical lensflare always disappears when taking photos in regular photo mode, but by making a movie clip and grabbing one frame, I was able to capture it.
1. posted by Mathieu 'P01' HENRI at 18:44 on May 17, 2005
AFAIK the horizontal/vertical lens flare depends on the layout of the CCD cells. No ?
Wonderful picture.
Wonderful picture.
2. posted by Fidel at 00:11 on May 26, 2005
Well with the nature of light it could be a number of things, including refraction of clouds, refraction angle of the sun on the atmosphere, season.. Even from my limited knowledge of ccd arrangement, I don't think that would have anything to do with it. I think the reason he got it at all might have to do with the way a digital camera would be continously capturing info.
3. posted by Fidel at 00:12 on May 26, 2005
forgot the reason I was gonna comment. Great tip!
add a comment
1. posted by huphtur at 19:04 on May 13, 2005
somewhat http://lighttight.com/ like
2. posted by Milo at 21:59 on May 13, 2005
Whoa, also very nice... I like its occasional pigeon photography.
add a comment
1. posted by marcos at 22:16 on October 14, 2005
My site is somewhat more artificial, but I hope you will like it... Enter and vote!
Regards
Marcos
add a comment
Regards
Marcos
1. posted by Mathieu 'P01' HENRI at 16:16 on May 12, 2005
o_O I didn't knew the in statement could be used outside of a "for( iterator in object )"
2. posted by Milo at 16:22 on May 12, 2005
Now that I think about it, unless I'm missing something, one could also simply use:
var TypeInSet = nodeType in [2, 3, 4, 7, 8];
...thus bypassing the need for the custom set() function.
var TypeInSet = nodeType in [2, 3, 4, 7, 8];
...thus bypassing the need for the custom set() function.
3. posted by Milo at 16:27 on May 12, 2005
Oh wait, I am indeed missing something :)
in checks the *index*, not the values, so my idea makes no sense at all.
in checks the *index*, not the values, so my idea makes no sense at all.
4. posted by Mathieu 'P01' HENRI at 16:39 on May 12, 2005
:)
It's not exactly the indexes. It's the name of the properties ( member variables ) of the object.
It's not exactly the indexes. It's the name of the properties ( member variables ) of the object.
5. posted by Milo at 16:43 on May 12, 2005
True... but with regard to arrays I always think of those as 'string-based indexes' ;)
Anyway, to make something that *does* work for array literals, I came up with this:
Array.prototype.contains = function(n)
{
for (var i in this)
{
if (this[i] == n) { return true; }
}
return false;
}
var typeInSet = [2, 3, 4, 7, 8].contains( nodeType );
add a comment
Anyway, to make something that *does* work for array literals, I came up with this:
Array.prototype.contains = function(n)
{
for (var i in this)
{
if (this[i] == n) { return true; }
}
return false;
}
var typeInSet = [2, 3, 4, 7, 8].contains( nodeType );
1. posted by woof at 22:30 on May 15, 2005
I love it... you must tell me how you took that photo, its fantastic!
2. posted by Milo at 22:48 on May 15, 2005
It involves some crouching and cat calling.
3. posted by Mathieu 'P01' HENRI at 00:09 on May 16, 2005
To get more photos of that kingd you should make a mask with your favicon.
=^_^=
add a comment
=^_^=
1. posted by Mathieu 'P01' HENRI at 22:07 on May 04, 2005
Cool angle and light. The red mailbox even bring back another touch of red.
2. posted by Arthur! at 16:16 on May 09, 2005
We got a parking ticket there once. :)
add a comment
1. posted by wheat at 21:50 on May 20, 2005
Really beautiful, especially the inquisitive look you're getting from the mother.
2. posted by msn.com,teaosoe3,micki at 17:17 on November 08, 2005
LOVE IT!
add a comment
1. posted by Low at 20:41 on May 28, 2005