1-48 of
222 entries in category 'coding'
pages:
1
2
3
4
5
1. posted by Jan! at 13:32 on December 03, 2006
This makes my head hurt. Very impressive, and only on teh Internets can one obsess (mainly) about one line of code and find its origins so easily.
2. posted by Milo at 13:44 on December 03, 2006
Yeah, that's what I love about this. That a bit of code can be part of history and legend, to the point where people go on virtual archeological excursions to find out more about it.
add a comment
1. posted by absolut at 14:06 on November 01, 2006
So will you use captcha here, milo?
2. posted by Milo at 14:11 on November 01, 2006
Maybe some day... So far I manage to block most spam comments with a simple set of filters.
3. posted by exolog.nl,alex,Alex at 22:51 on November 08, 2006
Hello to all.
I write capcha class for it,If all goes fine you will able to use it in 2 days.
add a comment
I write capcha class for it,If all goes fine you will able to use it in 2 days.
1. posted by Mathieu 'p01' HENRI at 16:41 on November 14, 2005
^__^
2. posted by Milo at 16:42 on November 14, 2005
Did you find all three?
3. posted by Calm_Pear at 11:17 on November 15, 2005
ha... had me looking there, I only spotted two at first but the third would be the missing http, right?
4. posted by Milo at 11:19 on November 15, 2005
Yep, the missing http:// will cause a file not found error and fail to load the script.
5. posted by Mathieu 'p01' HENRI at 13:21 on November 15, 2005
woops, I missed the " http:// " error :p
6. posted by Jan! at 23:04 on November 15, 2005
That was the one I spotted first. Are the other two the missing "=" and the fancy quotes instead of regular ones?
7. posted by Milo at 23:15 on November 15, 2005
Wow Jan!, the fancy non-js-safe quotes would actually be the fourth error! I hadn't even noticed those.
By the other two I meant the missing "=" and the missing quote in the first line.
By the other two I meant the missing "=" and the missing quote in the first line.
8. posted by Mathieu 'p01' HENRI at 00:28 on November 17, 2005
I thought the quotes where weird because of the font and a dumb text module in the image program used to make that image. But indeed, a JS parser will crash on them.
add a comment
Flickr view big bookmarklet
I wrote this little bookmarklet to help me instantly grab the large/original version of any Flickr photo. Funnily enough, because of Flickr's consistent filenaming scheme, it also works for photos where the See different sizes
option normally remains hidden:
view big (gets 1024px version; should work for most photos)
){s=M[m].src; if(s && s.match(/static/) && !s.match(/_s|buddy/)){void(window.open(s.replace('.jpg','_b.jpg'),'_self')); break}}){kind=link}
view original (gets full version as uploaded; works for photos pre-March 2007)
){s=M[m].src; if(s && s.match(/static/) && !s.match(/_s|buddy/)){void(window.open(s.replace('.jpg','_o.jpg'),'_self')); break}}){kind=link}
Drag the link above to your Bookmarks Toolbar (or right click, Add to Favorites), then click it when viewing a single Flickr photo page.
Here's the formatted source code, if you're into that sorta thing:
for (m in M=document.getElementsByTagName('img'))
{
s = M[m].src;
if (s && s.match(/static/) && !s.match(/_s|buddy/))
{
void(window.open(s.replace('.jpg','_o.jpg'),'_self'));
break;
}
}1. posted by Ivan at 15:46 on October 28, 2005
wow very smrt and handy
2. posted by Nick at 16:19 on October 28, 2005
Thanks for sharing this!
3. posted by Ruben at 17:46 on October 28, 2005
You sneaky hacker! ;-)
4. posted by Konstantinos at 01:06 on November 08, 2005
Very nice! Can it be modified to work for PNGs as well?
5. posted by kwota.net,chris,chris at 02:29 on November 03, 2006
I call it Bigr. Awesome.
6. posted by hccnet.nl,r.j.m.vermeulen,r.j.m.vermeulen at 10:23 on January 18, 2007
hi MILO
I saw your photos
PaRob
I saw your photos
PaRob
7. posted by francis at 00:11 on February 06, 2007
this is really great i can use this on pc with windows
but with osx on my mackbook it dont work ;(.
but with osx on my mackbook it dont work ;(.
8. posted by juice at 01:56 on March 07, 2007
Doesn't seem to work under FF2 in Windows :-(
9. posted by James at 14:13 on March 07, 2007
If you replace (s.replace('.jpg','_o.jpg') with (s.replace('.jpg','_b.jpg') rather than getting the original you can view the large version (1024x800).
Flickr have added a security feature to help protect the original.
Flickr have added a security feature to help protect the original.
10. posted by Milo at 14:28 on March 07, 2007
Good point James. For the time being I've just split the bookmarklet into two version: one for _o and one for _b.
add a comment
New bookmarklet: counters
(drag to Links-bar or right-click to Add to Favorites)
Tested in IE6 and Firefox. For every mouseclick, a small [1], [2], [3] incrementing counter will appear. Handy if you want to easily count the number of times something occurs on a page, such as the number of films you've seen of a specific IMDb actor/director (which prompted this idea in my case).
read more »
(drag to Links-bar or right-click to Add to Favorites)
Tested in IE6 and Firefox. For every mouseclick, a small [1], [2], [3] incrementing counter will appear. Handy if you want to easily count the number of times something occurs on a page, such as the number of films you've seen of a specific IMDb actor/director (which prompted this idea in my case).
1. posted by Mathieu 'P01' HENRI at 10:01 on June 30, 2005
Aside drawing yellow moustaches on a page, what kind of use can you make of it ?
2. posted by Milo at 11:05 on June 30, 2005
Well, count stuff, obviously :)
Now I know I've seen 23 Susumu Terajima films... http://imdb.com/name/nm0855398/
Now I know I've seen 23 Susumu Terajima films... http://imdb.com/name/nm0855398/
3. posted by Milo at 11:07 on June 30, 2005
Also handy for finding out how many of the top 250 movies you have seen: http://imdb.com/chart/top
4. posted by Mathieu 'P01' HENRI at 15:37 on June 30, 2005
Lousy me, I thought of something slightly beyond simply counting stuffs :p
Like adding a note.
Like adding a note.
5. posted by Milo at 15:40 on June 30, 2005
Something like this? (Try the 'notes' link above)
I'd expand it with the option to edit and move current notes, but I'm sure somebody else has already built this...
:)
I'd expand it with the option to edit and move current notes, but I'm sure somebody else has already built this...
:)
6. posted by Mathieu 'P01' HENRI at 18:15 on June 30, 2005
It'd be cool to have the numbers, and that the note appear on hover of them. Gosh, why am I at work while I could fiddle on the bookmarklet :p
But yeah, you are certainly re-inventing the wheel.
But yeah, you are certainly re-inventing the wheel.
7. posted by Mathieu 'P01' HENRI at 15:04 on July 01, 2005
Indeed, it's been done already: http://www.clagnut.com/sandbox/browser-stickies.html
add a comment
photographic favicons
Tee hee, each photo entry on this site now gets as a unique favicon a 16x16 version of the photo itself. Looks kinda neat when you open a bunch of them in tabs (try it out by middle-clicking some of the id numbers of the entries below).
I love it when ideas go from thought to successful implementation in less than 10 minutes.
Update: adding a photo to this entry so you can see it in action right here...
I love it when ideas go from thought to successful implementation in less than 10 minutes.
Update: adding a photo to this entry so you can see it in action right here...
1. posted by Joaquin at 17:32 on June 23, 2005
I love this trick! Never seen it before either, now I think about it.
2. posted by ACJ at 20:16 on June 23, 2005
…and yet another idea I have played with in my head, but that was actually realized by Milo! ☺ By the way, did you just impliment them for your color domains (http://fff.milov.nl/, etc.), or did they already have those?
3. posted by Milo at 20:24 on June 23, 2005
Funny, I was just about to mention those... I added them a while ago actually: http://milov.nl/2544#comment6341
...based on a completely separate idea and script, as it happens ☺
...based on a completely separate idea and script, as it happens ☺
4. posted by nowak at 21:28 on June 23, 2005
Clever. Couldn't you extend it so that the top level domain favicon is the most recent photo, too?
5. posted by Milo at 21:38 on June 23, 2005
Indeed... thanks for reminding me what triggered this whole idea in the first place. Per-entry favicons were easier so I've done those first.
6. posted by Mathieu 'P01' HENRI at 11:41 on June 24, 2005
Interresting idea
7. posted by Mathieu 'P01' HENRI at 21:21 on June 29, 2005
It'd be cool to have the photographic favicon on the pages of full size photos, e.g. http://milov.nl/2005/06/rotterdam-crossing
8. posted by Milo at 22:17 on June 29, 2005
You're right, that is cool. And now it's working.
9. posted by Mathieu 'P01' HENRI at 23:24 on June 29, 2005
;)
add a comment
new feeds view
milov.nl/feeds/
I'm having a lot of fun styling my new simple and lean blo.gs-powered feeds view. Check it out in a browser that supports modern CSS (i.e. not IE) and observe
Update:
Well, it seems blo.gs is offline for a bit after being sold to some unknown party, so the feeds view might not get updated for quite some time. Anybody know any other good centralized weblog update trackers? I tried BlogRolling for a while but it only seemed to indicate one new updated weblog per day.
Update 2:
blo.gs is back, yay! Turns out it's been acquired by Yahoo!.
I'm having a lot of fun styling my new simple and lean blo.gs-powered feeds view. Check it out in a browser that supports modern CSS (i.e. not IE) and observe
li:hover, ::after and content: attr(href) in action...Update:
Well, it seems blo.gs is offline for a bit after being sold to some unknown party, so the feeds view might not get updated for quite some time. Anybody know any other good centralized weblog update trackers? I tried BlogRolling for a while but it only seemed to indicate one new updated weblog per day.
Update 2:
blo.gs is back, yay! Turns out it's been acquired by Yahoo!.
1. posted by Ruben at 22:54 on June 13, 2005
Looking cool, Milo.
2. posted by Nick at 09:28 on June 14, 2005
Nicely done!
Cool pun by the way: 'i.e. not IE'.
Cool pun by the way: 'i.e. not IE'.
3. posted by wchulseiee at 18:23 on June 14, 2005
what about http://www.bloglines.com? although it's owned by askjeeves, it seems to work pretty nicely.
4. posted by Milo at 18:37 on June 14, 2005
Ah, good point, I even have an account there already. But I'm having a hard time finding anything beyond the three-pane standard view... Do they offer a simple flat view of blog names and their last update time anywhere?
Basically I just want to be able to Ctrl-click the blog names to open them in new Firefox tabs, rather than being forced to read them via the bloglines interface.
Basically I just want to be able to Ctrl-click the blog names to open them in new Firefox tabs, rather than being forced to read them via the bloglines interface.
5. posted by wchulseiee at 18:47 on June 14, 2005
there is something called 'blogroll wizard': http://www.bloglines.com/help/share. It generates a javascript or php code snippe t you can use
6. posted by wchulseiee at 18:54 on June 14, 2005
ok, not really php code, more like just an url :) and no update times either.
7. posted by Milo at 19:58 on June 14, 2005
That's something I could use, thanks.
add a comment
1. posted by Milo at 14:34 on June 17, 2005
Whoa... I just realized I linked this same message 3 years ago:
http://milov.nl/1416
add a comment
http://milov.nl/1416
1. posted by Erik at 09:26 on July 05, 2005
There is also a pretty decent htaccess cheatsheet at http://www.thejackol.com/htaccess-cheatsheet/
add a comment
1. posted by Mathieu 'P01' HENRI at 16:16 on May 12, 2005
o_O I didn't knew the in statement could be used outside of a "for( iterator in object )"
2. posted by Milo at 16:22 on May 12, 2005
Now that I think about it, unless I'm missing something, one could also simply use:
var TypeInSet = nodeType in [2, 3, 4, 7, 8];
...thus bypassing the need for the custom set() function.
var TypeInSet = nodeType in [2, 3, 4, 7, 8];
...thus bypassing the need for the custom set() function.
3. posted by Milo at 16:27 on May 12, 2005
Oh wait, I am indeed missing something :)
in checks the *index*, not the values, so my idea makes no sense at all.
in checks the *index*, not the values, so my idea makes no sense at all.
4. posted by Mathieu 'P01' HENRI at 16:39 on May 12, 2005
:)
It's not exactly the indexes. It's the name of the properties ( member variables ) of the object.
It's not exactly the indexes. It's the name of the properties ( member variables ) of the object.
5. posted by Milo at 16:43 on May 12, 2005
True... but with regard to arrays I always think of those as 'string-based indexes' ;)
Anyway, to make something that *does* work for array literals, I came up with this:
Array.prototype.contains = function(n)
{
for (var i in this)
{
if (this[i] == n) { return true; }
}
return false;
}
var typeInSet = [2, 3, 4, 7, 8].contains( nodeType );
add a comment
Anyway, to make something that *does* work for array literals, I came up with this:
Array.prototype.contains = function(n)
{
for (var i in this)
{
if (this[i] == n) { return true; }
}
return false;
}
var typeInSet = [2, 3, 4, 7, 8].contains( nodeType );
something new
border-style: dashed;.Exact rendering depends on browser model and window size. Warning: hypnotizing!
1. posted by Low at 10:19 on July 30, 2008
2. posted by Dal Jean at 16:39 on July 30, 2008
3. posted by Marc at 23:00 on August 02, 2008